Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 39
Filtrar
1.
Res Involv Engagem ; 9(1): 50, 2023 Jul 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37430378

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Authentic researcher-youth partnerships in patient-oriented research (POR) where the research responds to the needs expressed by youth themselves are essential to make research meaningful. While patient-oriented research (POR) is increasingly practiced, few training programs exist in Canada and none, to our knowledge, are tailored for youth with neurodevelopmental disabilities (NDD). Our primary objective was to explore the training needs of youth (ages 18-25) with NDD to enhance their knowledge, confidence, and skills as research partners. Our secondary objective was to identify the benefits and challenges of engaging youth with NDD in a POR approach. METHODS: Our team of four youth and one parent with lived experience [Youth Engagement in Research (YER) partners] and six researchers engaged in POR to investigate the primary objective via two phases: (1) individual interviews with youth living with NDD and (2) a two-day virtual symposium with focus groups with youth and researchers. Collaborative qualitative content analysis was employed to synthesize the data. Our secondary objective was assessed by asking our YER partners to complete the Public and Patient Engagement Evaluation Tool (PPEET) survey and participate in reflective discussions. RESULTS: Phase 1 participants (n = 7) identified various barriers and facilitators to their engagement in research and offered suggestions to meet their needs through minimizing barriers and integrating facilitators, which would subsequently enhance their knowledge, confidence, and skills as research partners. Informed by phase 1, phase 2 participants (n = 17) prioritized the following POR training needs: researcher-youth communication, research roles and responsibilities, and finding partnership opportunities. For delivery methods, participants stated the importance of youth representation, using Universal Design for Learning, and co-learning between youth and researchers. Based on the PPEET data and subsequent discussions, YER partners agreed that they were able to express views freely, feel that their views were heard, and that their participation made a meaningful difference. Challenges included scheduling difficulties, ensuring multiple methods for engagement, and working under short timelines. CONCLUSION: This study identified important training needs for youth with NDD and for researchers to engage in meaningful POR, which can subsequently inform the co-production of accessible training opportunities with and for youth.


Partnerships between researchers and youth, known as patient-oriented research (POR), are needed to make sure research is meaningful to youth. Our main goal was to explore the training needs of youth (ages 18-25) with neurodevelopmental disabilities (NDD) to enhance their knowledge, confidence, and skills as research partners. To find out, our team of four youth and one parent with lived experience (YER partners) and six researchers completed this project in two parts: 1) interviews with youth and 2) a two-day virtual workshop with youth and researchers. Data from the two parts were reviewed to answer our question. We learned from Part 1 that the needs of participants can be met by providing support and reducing barriers in POR. From Part 2, the top three important topics in partnerships were: researcher-youth communication, research roles and responsibilities, and finding partnership opportunities. Participants in the workshop emphasized having different youth represented, using a framework that allows learning for everyone, and co-learning between youth and researchers in the creation of learning materials. Our second goal was to understand the benefits and challenges of our partnership. To assess, YER partners completed a survey and reflected about their experiences. YER partners agreed on being able to express views, feel that their views were heard, and that their participation made a meaningful difference. Challenges included scheduling difficulties, providing multiple ways to partner, and working under short timelines. Overall, the study described important POR needs for youth and researchers, which can inform future training opportunities.

2.
Health Psychol Behav Med ; 11(1): 2170378, 2023.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36733299

RESUMEN

Introduction: Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) complicates ∼16% of pregnancies in Australia and has significant implications for health of both mother and baby. Antenatal anxiety and depression are also associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes. The interaction between GDM and mental health in pregnancy is poorly understood. With the aim of exploring the nuanced interaction between GDM and mental health further, we investigated whether GDM treatment modality (diet versus insulin) influenced psychological wellbeing in women with GDM. Methods: Psychological wellbeing was assessed in women with GDM treated with diet (GDM-Diet, n = 20) or insulin (GDM-Insulin, n = 15) and pregnant women without GDM (non-GDM, n = 20) using questionnaires [Edinburgh Depression Scale (EDS), State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI-6), and in women with GDM, Problem Areas in Diabetes (PAID)] at 24-34 weeks gestation and again at ∼36 weeks gestation. Results: Women in the GDM-insulin group had significantly higher levels of anxiety than the non-GDM group at both time points. Women in the GDM-Diet group had higher levels of anxiety at 24-34 weeks gestation than the non-GDM group but did not differ at ∼36 weeks gestation. Although depression scores tended to be higher in GDM-Insulin and GDM-Diet groups than in the non-GDM group at both time points, this was not statistically significant. Diabetes-related distress was similar in the GDM-Diet and GDM-Insulin groups at both time points and did not change during pregnancy. A high proportion of the GDM-Insulin group had past/current mental illness (60%). Conclusions: In this pilot study GDM was associated with differences in psychological wellbeing, specifically increased anxiety in women treated with insulin. Specialised interventions to support women with GDM should be considered, especially those requiring insulin.Trial registration: Not applicable as this was a purely observational study.

3.
J Infect ; 85(2): 147-151, 2022 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35659543

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Although often presenting as a self-limiting childhood disease, chickenpox can have serious consequences if acquired in pregnancy. Until April 2022, the UK recommendations were that varicella immunoglobulin (VZIG) should be administered intramuscularly to susceptible pregnant women exposed to chickenpox prior to 20 weeks gestation. Oral aciclovir or VZIG was recommended if exposure occurred at 20+ weeks gestation. Our objective was to compare the effectiveness of oral aciclovir to VZIG in preventing maternal and neonatal chickenpox. METHODS: We identified and followed up 186 pregnant women who were exposed to chickenpox and compared their outcomes. RESULTS: 171/186 (91.9%) of these women received either VZIG or oral aciclovir. Of the 145 women who received VZIG, 53/145 (36.6%) went on to develop chickenpox compared to 8 of the 26 (30.8%) women who received oral aciclovir (p = 0.32). No statistical difference was found between the oral aciclovir and VZIG groups even after controlling for maternal age, gestational stage, type of exposure and IgG titre (adjusted OR:0.83; 95%CI:0.26-2.65; p = 0.75). CONCLUSIONS: These findings support the use of oral aciclovir as first-line prophylaxis in pregnant women exposed to varicella as they suggest its effectiveness at preventing maternal chickenpox is either better or equal to VZIG.


Asunto(s)
Aciclovir , Varicela , Aciclovir/uso terapéutico , Anticuerpos Antivirales , Antivirales/uso terapéutico , Varicela/prevención & control , Niño , Femenino , Humanos , Sueros Inmunes , Recién Nacido , Masculino , Embarazo
4.
Eur J Haematol ; 106(4): 456-466, 2021 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33289927

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: von Willebrand disease (vWD) is a heterogeneous hereditary bleeding disorder and is associated with risk of primary postpartum haemorrhage (PPH). DESIGN AND METHODS: An observational study at a tertiary referral centre in Australia of 16 women with 23 deliveries with a median age of 27.5 years (range, 21-39; IQR = 9). Median gestational age at delivery was 39 weeks (range, 35-41; IQR = 1.1). RESULTS: All cases had type 1 vWD, apart from one case with type 2. Patients were managed in combined obstetrics and haematology clinics. PPH occurred in ten deliveries (44%). Intravenous desmopressin was administered in 6 cases, and IV human vWF was administered in 4 cases. Two cases with mild vWD had received oral tranexamic acid. The median Apgar score at 1 and 5 min was 9 (IQR = 1.0), while the median Apgar score at 10 min was 10.0 (IQR = 0.0). One case required transfusion of blood products postdelivery. There were no other significant complications observed. CONCLUSIONS: vWD was associated with a high incidence of primary PPH. Individualised treatment to restore haemostasis, according to the severity of the disease, could achieve as possible, normal haemostasis with favourable outcomes for both mothers and their infants. Further studies to confirm our findings are warranted.


Asunto(s)
Hospitalización , Complicaciones Hematológicas del Embarazo/epidemiología , Enfermedades de von Willebrand/epidemiología , Adulto , Australia/epidemiología , Femenino , Edad Gestacional , Humanos , Hemorragia Posparto/epidemiología , Hemorragia Posparto/etiología , Embarazo , Resultado del Embarazo , Vigilancia en Salud Pública , Adulto Joven , Enfermedades de von Willebrand/diagnóstico , Enfermedades de von Willebrand/etiología , Factor de von Willebrand/genética
5.
J Am Anim Hosp Assoc ; 56(4): e56401, 2020.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32412338

RESUMEN

A 5 yr old male neutered Labrador retriever was evaluated for an 8 wk history of a slowly progressive abnormal hind limb gait that did not respond to treatment with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatories. Initial examination findings were mild pelvic limb ataxia and moderate right pelvic limb lameness. A computed tomography with a myelogram was performed and showed a suspected intramedullary spinal mass. MRI was conducted and supported the computed tomography with myelogram findings of a possible intradural spinal mass at L1. A left-sided hemilaminectomy followed by a durotomy at L1 was performed and a firm, tan mass was removed. The histopathologic findings indicated a vascular proliferation most suggestive of a rare proliferative disorder of leptomeningeal blood vessels termed meningioangiomatosis. Although the dog's signs initially worsened after surgery and he was nonambulatory with marked paraparesis, he regained ambulation within 3-4 wk after the operation. Eighteen months after surgery, he was ambulatory with mild hind limb ataxia with no progression of signs. This case suggests that surgical resection of lesions of suspected meningioangiomatosis can result in improvement of clinical signs with a good long-term prognosis.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades de los Perros/cirugía , Neoplasias Meníngeas/veterinaria , Meningioma/veterinaria , Animales , Enfermedades de los Perros/patología , Perros , Vértebras Lumbares , Masculino , Neoplasias Meníngeas/patología , Neoplasias Meníngeas/cirugía , Meningioma/patología , Meningioma/cirugía , Médula Espinal/patología , Médula Espinal/cirugía , Vértebras Torácicas
6.
Contraception ; 101(4): 213-219, 2020 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31857077

RESUMEN

The Society of Family Planning Research Fund (SFPRF) provides grants for research on abortion and contraception. In 2017, SFPRF conducted a retrospective evaluation of its investment in family planning research. Using a developmental evaluation approach, we created a framework for assessing research impact in family planning and applied it to an analysis of our grantmaking between 2007 and 2017. Our framework consists of 30 indicators of research impact, which span nine impact categories from building researchers' capacity to influencing individuals, communities, and systems. Through application of this framework to our grantmaking, we learned that our grantmaking has helped build the research capacity of emerging and established family planning scholars and advance the field of family planning by supporting the creation of a robust scholarly evidence base. At the same time, we identified less evidence of impact on policy and practice. The results of this analysis directed SFPRF to move towards more focused funding opportunities, including longer-term and larger investments, and to prioritize partnerships between researchers and knowledge brokers.


Asunto(s)
Servicios de Planificación Familiar/normas , Organización de la Financiación , Investigación/economía , Aborto Inducido/economía , Anticoncepción/economía , Femenino , Evaluación del Impacto en la Salud , Humanos , Embarazo , Investigación Cualitativa
7.
Am J Obstet Gynecol ; 220(1): 67-70, 2019 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30267653

RESUMEN

Barriers to women's reproductive health care access, particularly for termination of pregnancy, are increasing at the local, regional, and national levels through numerous institutional, legislative, and regulatory restrictions. Lack of access to reproductive health care has negative consequences for women's health. Twelve women's health care organizations affirm their support for access to comprehensive reproductive health care, including abortion.


Asunto(s)
Aborto Inducido/legislación & jurisprudencia , Actitud del Personal de Salud , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/organización & administración , Salud Reproductiva/legislación & jurisprudencia , Salud de la Mujer , Atención a la Salud/legislación & jurisprudencia , Femenino , Personal de Salud , Humanos , Evaluación de Necesidades , Obstetricia/métodos , Embarazo , Sociedades Médicas , Estados Unidos
8.
Semin Hematol ; 55(4): 223-234, 2018 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30502851

RESUMEN

Iron deficiency anaemia (IDA) is the most common nutritional deficiency affecting pregnant women worldwide. This study aims to compare the efficacy and safety of a newly available intravenous (IV) iron preparation, ferric carboxymaltose (FCM), against IV iron polymaltose (IPM), and standard oral iron (ferrous sulphate) for the treatment of IDA in pregnancy. This is an open-labelled prospective randomised controlled trial (RCT) with intention-to-treat analysis conducted at a primary health care facility with a single tertiary referral centre in Launceston. Tasmania, Australia. A 3-arm randomised controlled trial was conducted comparing a single IV infusion of 1000mg of FCM (n = 83 patients) over 15 minutes against a single IV infusion of 1000mg of IPM (n = 82) over 2 hours against 325mg daily oral ferrous sulphate (n = 81) until delivery, for the treatment of IDA in pregnancy. A total of 246 consecutive pregnant women were recruited between September 2013 and July 2014. The median age was 28 years, with a median and mean gestation of 27 weeks. The median serum ferritin was 9µg/L, with a mean of 13µg/L. The mean haemoglobin (Hb) was 114g/L. The primary outcome was the change in ferritin and Hb levels at 4 weeks after intervention. Secondary outcomes included ferritin and Hb improvements at predelivery, safety, tolerability, quality of life (QoL), cost utility, and fetal outcomes. The mean Hb level differences between the baseline intervention time point and 4 weeks thereafter were significantly higher in the FCM versus the oral group by 4.35g/L (95% CI: 1.64-7.05; P = 0.0006) and in the IPM vs the oral group by 4.08g/L (95% CI: 1.57-6.60; P = 0.0005), but not different between the FCM and IPM groups (0.26g/L; 95% CI: -2.59 to 3.11; P = 0.9740). The mean ferritin level differences were significantly higher at 4 weeks in the FCM vs oral iron group by 166µg/L (95% CI: 138-194; P < 0.0001) and in the IPM vs oral iron group by 145µg/L (95% CI: 109-1180, P < 0.0001), but not between the 2 IV groups (21.5µg/L; 95% CI: -23.9 to 66.9; P = 0.4989). Administration of IV FCM during pregnancy was safe and better tolerated than IV IPM or oral iron. Compliance to oral iron was the lowest amongst treatment groups with one-third of the patients missing doses of daily iron tablets. Significant improvement in overall QoL scores was observed in both IV iron supplement groups by achieving normal ferritin following effective and prompt repletion of iron stores, compared to the oral iron group (P = 0.04, 95% CI: 21.3, 1.8). The overall cost utility of IV FCM and IV IPM appear to be similar to oral iron. There were no differences in the fetal outcomes between the 3 trial arms. In conclusion, this study demonstrates that a single IV iron infusion is an effective and safe option for treatment of IDA during pregnancy. FCM was more convenient than other treatments. Rapid parenteral iron repletion can improve iron stores, Hb levels and QoL in pregnant women, with ongoing benefits until delivery. Integration of IV iron for IDA in pregnancy can potentially improve pregnancy outcomes for the mother. Update of guidelines to integrate the use of new IV iron preparations in pregnancy is warranted.


Asunto(s)
Anemia Ferropénica/tratamiento farmacológico , Compuestos Férricos/uso terapéutico , Compuestos Ferrosos/uso terapéutico , Infusiones Intravenosas/métodos , Maltosa/análogos & derivados , Administración Oral , Adolescente , Adulto , Femenino , Compuestos Férricos/farmacología , Compuestos Ferrosos/farmacología , Humanos , Maltosa/farmacología , Maltosa/uso terapéutico , Persona de Mediana Edad , Embarazo , Estudios Prospectivos , Adulto Joven
9.
Am J Public Health ; 107(12): 1878-1882, 2017 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29048963

RESUMEN

In the United States, groups advocating for and against abortion rights often deploy public health arguments to advance their positions. Recently, these arguments have evolved into state laws that use the government health department infrastructure to increase law enforcement and regulatory activities around abortion. Many major medical and public health associations oppose these new laws because they are not evidence-based and do not protect women's health. Yet state health departments have been defending these laws in court. We propose a 21st-century public health approach to abortion based in an accepted public health framework. Specifically, we apply the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's 10 Essential Public Health Services framework to abortion to describe how health departments should engage with abortion. With this public health framework as our guide, we argue that health departments should be facilitating women's ability to obtain an abortion in the state and county where they reside, researching barriers to abortion care in their states and counties, and promoting the use of a scientific evidence base in abortion-related laws, policies, regulations, and implementation of essential services.


Asunto(s)
Aborto Legal , Práctica de Salud Pública , Aborto Legal/legislación & jurisprudencia , Femenino , Política de Salud , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud , Humanos , Embarazo , Gobierno Estatal , Estados Unidos
10.
Contraception ; 96(6): 401-410, 2017 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28867439

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE(S): We studied women's experiences seeking and receiving second-trimester abortion care in two geographically and legislatively different settings to inform ways to improve abortion care access and services. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted in-depth interviews with women who obtained second-trimester abortion care. Themes from the interviews were then used to inform a self-administered survey, which was completed by 108 women who received second-trimester abortion care in the Northeast and Midwest. We calculated descriptive statistics and used chi-squared and t-tests to compare responses. RESULTS: We interviewed eight women and surveyed 108 women. Most interviewees and 65.2% of survey respondents reported difficulties accessing care. Although most interview and survey respondents had insurance, a slight majority reported difficulty funding care. All interviewees and 57.9% of survey respondents reported positive experiences with providers, with many interviewees and 62.0% of survey respondents saying their abortion care was better than their usual health care. Most interviewees and 75.8% of survey respondents reported pain as low to moderate, and the majority of participants reported it was the same or less than expected. Knowledge about abortion restrictions was low. Most interviewees and 68.4% survey respondents disagreed with restrictions on insurance coverage of abortion. Common recommendations to improve experiences were to ensure travel and financial support and to decrease wait times at clinics. There were few regional differences among outcomes. CONCLUSION(S): Women seeking second-trimester abortion in these locations reported positive abortion experiences. However, they had to overcome significant obstacles to obtain care. IMPLICATIONS: This is the first study to systematically research women's second-trimester care experiences in two different regions of the United States. Regardless of location, women experienced barriers due to policies that impose gestational age restrictions, limit provider availability (consequently increasing wait times), and increase costs. Policy change to reduce these barriers is critical to improve access to and experiences with second trimester abortion care.


Asunto(s)
Aborto Inducido/economía , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/economía , Segundo Trimestre del Embarazo , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Cobertura del Seguro , Medio Oeste de Estados Unidos , New England , Embarazo , Calidad de la Atención de Salud , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Adulto Joven
11.
J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care ; 43(1): 7-15, 2017 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27172880

RESUMEN

A systematic review was conducted of 13 peer-reviewed articles and eight reports focused on indicators of quality abortion care. A total of 75 indicators of quality abortion were identified; these indicators address a variety of issues including policy, health systems, trained-provider availability, women's decision making, and morbidity and mortality. There is little agreement about indicators for measuring quality abortion care; more work is needed to ensure efforts to assess quality are informed and coordinated.

12.
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol ; 57(3): 272-279, 2017 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27549600

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is associated with life-long increased risk of type 2 diabetes: affected women are advised to undergo oral glucose tolerance testing (OGTT) at 6-12 weeks postpartum, then glucose screening every 1-3 years. AIMS: We investigated whether in women with GDM, antenatal clinical factors predicted postpartum abnormal glucose tolerance and compliance with screening. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In women with GDM delivering 2007 to mid-2009 in a single hospital, antenatal/obstetric data and glucose tests at 6-12 weeks postpartum and during 5.5 years post-pregnancy were retrospectively collected. Predictors of return for testing and abnormal glucose tolerance were identified using multivariate analysis. RESULTS: Of 165 women, 117 (70.9%) returned for 6-12 week postpartum OGTT: 23 (19.6%) were abnormal. Smoking and parity, independent of socioeconomic status, were associated with non-return for testing. Fasting glucose ≥5.4 mmol/L on pregnancy OGTT predicted both non-return for testing and abnormal OGTT. During 5.5 years post-pregnancy, 148 (89.7%) women accessed glucose screening: nine (6.1%) developed diabetes, 33 (22.3%) had impaired fasting glucose / impaired glucose tolerance. Predictors of abnormal glucose tolerance were fasting glucose ≥5.4 mmol/L and 2-h glucose ≥9.3 mmol/L on pregnancy OGTT (~2.5-fold increased risk), and polycystic ovary syndrome (~3.4 fold increased risk). Risk score calculation, based on combined antenatal factors, did not improve predictions. CONCLUSIONS: Antenatal clinical factors were modestly predictive of return for testing and abnormal glucose tolerance post-pregnancy in women with GDM. Risk score calculations were ineffective in predicting outcomes: risk scores developed in other populations require validation. Ongoing glucose screening is indicated for all women with GDM.


Asunto(s)
Glucemia/metabolismo , Diabetes Gestacional/sangre , Intolerancia a la Glucosa/epidemiología , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud , Adulto , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/sangre , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/epidemiología , Femenino , Intolerancia a la Glucosa/sangre , Prueba de Tolerancia a la Glucosa , Humanos , Paridad , Síndrome del Ovario Poliquístico/epidemiología , Periodo Posparto , Embarazo , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Fumar
13.
J Clin Diagn Res ; 10(5): QC06-9, 2016 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27437307

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander women are at increased risk of maternal morbidity and mortality as compared to non-Aboriginals. Similarly, aboriginal babies are at increased risk of low birth weight and infant mortality. AIM: To investigate the independent association of aboriginality with Tasmanian maternal and neonatal morbidity. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis of all the births (gestation more than 20 weeks) from June 2013 to May 2014 was conducted at the Launceston General Hospital, Tasmania. The study compared 66 Aboriginal (4.2% of the total births) to 1477 non-aboriginal births for maternal and neonatal morbidity. Comparisons were made using logistic regression. The outcome measures were maternal and neonatal morbidity. RESULTS: Significantly higher number of aboriginal women (49% vs 19%; OR 4.15 90%CI 2.52- 6.85) smoked and used illicit drugs (15% vs 2%; OR 9.24; 95%CI 4.28-19.96) than the non-aboriginal women (both p<0.001). Maternal morbidity was not significantly different between aboriginal compared to non-aboriginal women (OR 0.64; 95%CI 0.36-1.14; p=0.13; adjusted OR 1.00; 95%CI 0.52-1.93; p=0.99). Factors positively associated with maternal morbidity included: age (OR 1.28; 95%CI 1.13-1.46; p<0.01) and BMI (OR 1.50; 95%CI 1.33-1.70; p<0.01). The unadjusted OR of neonatal morbidity for aboriginality was 1.98 (95%CI 1.17-3.34; p=0.01) and adjusted was 1.45 (95%CI 0.77-2.72; p=0.25). Factors positively associated with neonatal morbidity included smoking (OR 2.24; 95%CI 1.59-3.14; p<0.01), illicit drug use 95%CI 1.49-(OR 3.26; 95%CI 1.49-7.13; p <0.01), hypertension (OR 2.49; 95%CI 1.61-3.84; p<0.01) and diabetes (OR 1.92; 95%CI 1.33-2.78; p<0.01). CONCLUSION: The composite Aboriginal maternal morbidity does not differ, however the increased rates of smoking and illicit drug use are largely responsible for neonatal morbidity. Along with strengthening strategies to decrease medical comorbidities in aboriginals, we recommend intensifying smoking and illicit drug cessation programs.

14.
Perspect Sex Reprod Health ; 47(3): 141-9, 2015 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26153842

RESUMEN

CONTEXT: Miscarriage care can safely and effectively be offered in appropriately equipped offices and emergency departments. However, it is often treated in the operating room, which limits access to timely, cost-effective and high-quality care. METHODS: Between May 2013 and January 2014, in-depth interviews were conducted with 30 staff holding diverse roles at 15 medical offices and emergency departments with the aim of exploring barriers to and facilitators of offering miscarriage care, and identifying methods for expanding care. On-site observations were also conducted at four facilities. All data were transcribed, iteratively coded and analyzed using qualitative techniques. RESULTS: Similar barriers to and facilitators of providing miscarriage care were identified across facility types. Barriers were physician preference for providing care in the operating room, the similarity of miscarriage management and abortion procedures, the limited availability of support staff, difficulties integrating miscarriage management into patient scheduling and flow, and uncertainty about responding to women's emotional needs. Facilitators were a commitment to evidence-based medicine, insurance coverage of miscarriage, offering other procedures of similar complexity and the minimal resources needed for miscarriage care. Resources needed to expand miscarriage services included a medically trained "champion," best practices for implementing services, persistence and patience, training, clear protocols, and systems for tracking equipment and supplies. CONCLUSIONS: Miscarriage care was viewed as neither resource-intensive nor technically complex to provide. Although it may be emotionally and politically challenging to offer, effective strategies are available for expanding the scope of miscarriage care offered in multiple settings.


Asunto(s)
Aborto Espontáneo/terapia , Actitud del Personal de Salud , Atención a la Salud/métodos , Servicios de Salud Materna , Aborto Espontáneo/psicología , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Femenino , Humanos , Quirófanos , Embarazo , Investigación Cualitativa
15.
Womens Health Issues ; 25(5): 463-9, 2015.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26082276

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: At a time when most states are working to restrict abortion, Massachusetts stands out as one of the few states with multiple state-level policies in place that support abortion access for low-income women. In 2006, Massachusetts passed health care reform, which resulted in almost all residents having insurance. Also, almost all state-level public and subsidized insurance programs cover abortion and there are fewer restrictions on abortion in Massachusetts compared with other states. METHODS: We explored low-income women's experiences accessing abortion in Massachusetts through 27 in-depth telephone interviews with a racially diverse sample of low-income women who obtained abortions. Interviews were digitally recorded, transcribed, coded, and analyzed thematically. RESULTS: Most women described having access to timely, conveniently located, affordable, and highly acceptable abortion care. However, a sizable minority of women had difficulty enrolling in or staying on insurance, making abortion expensive. A small minority of women said their abortion care could be improved by increasing emotional support and privacy, and decreasing appointment times. Some limited data also suggest that young women and immigrant women face specific barriers to care. CONCLUSION: This study provides important, novel information about the need for state-level policies that support access to health insurance and comprehensive abortion coverage. Such policies, along with a well-functioning health care environment, help to ensure that low-income women have access to abortion. However, not all abortion access challenges have been resolved in Massachusetts. More work is needed to ensure that all women can access affordable, confidential care that is responsive to their specific needs and preferences.


Asunto(s)
Aborto Inducido/estadística & datos numéricos , Reforma de la Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Cobertura del Seguro/estadística & datos numéricos , Seguro de Salud/economía , Pobreza , Aborto Inducido/economía , Adulto , Femenino , Reforma de la Atención de Salud/economía , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/economía , Humanos , Cobertura del Seguro/organización & administración , Entrevistas como Asunto , Massachusetts , Medicaid/economía , Persona de Mediana Edad , Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act , Embarazo , Investigación Cualitativa , Factores Socioeconómicos , Estados Unidos , Adulto Joven
16.
Womens Health Issues ; 25(3): 224-31, 2015.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25797219

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) and sterilization are popular contraceptive methods. However, they have been associated with safety concerns and coercive practices. We aimed to understand women's opinions and experiences related to these methods, including whether the methods' fraught histories influence use or interest. METHODS: Between May and July 2013, we conducted an online survey with a convenience sample of 520 women aged 14 to 45. We used quota sampling to ensure women of color were at least 60% of our sample. Descriptive statistics, χ(2) tests, and multivariable logistic regression were used to estimate participants' awareness of, interest in, and experiences with LARCs and sterilization. FINDINGS: Overall, 30% of women reported current LARC use and 67% interest in future LARC use. Four percent reported sterilization use and 48% interest in future sterilization. In multivariate analyses, current LARC use was lower among Asian women versus White women (odds ratio [OR], 0.24), and interest in future use was higher among women aged 14 to 24 versus 35 to 45 (OR, 5.49). Interest in sterilization was higher among women aged 14 to 24 and 25 to 34 versus 35 to 45 (ORs, 3.29-3.66) and women with disabilities (OR, 1.64), and lower among Black compared with White women (OR, 0.41). Method misperceptions were evident, and concerns about contraceptive coercion were reported. CONCLUSIONS: Concerns about contraceptive coercion were not predominant reasons for noninterest in LARCs and sterilization, but were reported by some participants. Lower sterilization interest among Black women and higher sterilization interest among women with disabilities warrant further research. Efforts to address misperceptions about LARCs and sterilization, including their safety and efficacy, are needed.


Asunto(s)
Conducta Anticonceptiva/etnología , Anticoncepción/métodos , Anticonceptivos Femeninos/uso terapéutico , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Esterilización Reproductiva , Adolescente , Adulto , Dispositivos Anticonceptivos Femeninos/estadística & datos numéricos , Preparaciones de Acción Retardada , Femenino , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis Multivariante , Factores Socioeconómicos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Adulto Joven
17.
J Health Care Poor Underserved ; 25(4): 1571-85, 2014 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25418228

RESUMEN

Medicaid is designed to ensure low-income populations can afford health care. However, not all health services are covered by the program. Most state Medicaid programs restrict abortion coverage, though a small number of state programs offer such coverage. Little is known about how low-income women are affected by differing Medicaid coverage policies regarding abortion. We conducted in depth interviews with 98 low-income women who had abortions. We found that women's impressions about abortion costs and the availability of Medicaid coverage are generally accurate and that women rely predominantly on abortion facilities for confirmatory cost and coverage information. Additionally, when abortion is out of financial reach, women and the people in their lives experience numerous emotional and financial harms. Policies that aim to ensure abortion is affordable largely prevent these harms, though the availability of Medicaid coverage does not always guarantee access to affordable care. Findings can help advance evidence-based policies


Asunto(s)
Aborto Inducido/economía , Medicaid , Adolescente , Adulto , Femenino , Costos de la Atención en Salud , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/economía , Humanos , Entrevistas como Asunto , Medicaid/economía , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pobreza/economía , Embarazo , Estados Unidos , Adulto Joven
18.
Aust J Rural Health ; 22(5): 235-40, 2014 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25303415

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: There is a need for emerging Australian data on emergency peripartum hysterectomy (EPH) especially in rural areas due to the associated high maternal morbidity and mortality. The aim of this study is to review the incidence and complications of EPH in the northern region of Tasmania. DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study at a single health care institution during a 10 year period. SETTING: Launceston General Hospital, the main maternity referral centre for the northern region of Tasmania. PARTICIPANTS: Case notes of women coded with hysterectomy during childbirth were included and analysed. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcomes were maternal and neonatal morbidity and mortality. RESULTS: Eighteen women were identified, giving an incidence of 1.01 per 1000 births. Indications for surgery were abnormal placentation, uterine atony and uterine rupture. Maternal morbidity was high, and included intensive care admissions (55%), disseminated intravascular coagulopathy (50%), hypovolemic shock (38%), febrile illness (27%) and urinary tract injuries (22%). The mean estimated total blood loss was 4091.6 mL, and 88% of women received blood transfusions. All women received prophylactic antibiotics. Women with morbidly adherent placenta were likely to experience more complications and transfusions. There were no maternal or neonatal deaths identified. CONCLUSION: The rate of peripartum hysterectomy in rural Tasmania is higher compared with other Australian tertiary-level hospitals, suggesting that Australian women birthing in rural and regional areas might be at greater risk. Maternal morbidity associated with abnormal placentation is high; hence, better diagnostic modalities and multidisciplinary antenatal management are required to improve maternal outcomes.


Asunto(s)
Urgencias Médicas/epidemiología , Histerectomía/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Histerectomía/efectos adversos , Incidencia , Lactante , Mortalidad Infantil , Mortalidad Materna , Periodo Periparto , Embarazo , Complicaciones del Embarazo/epidemiología , Complicaciones del Embarazo/cirugía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Tasmania/epidemiología
19.
Women Health ; 54(7): 672-86, 2014.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25068780

RESUMEN

We explored how low-income abortion clients in states where public funding was and was not available perceived the role of public funding for abortion. From October 2010 through February 2011, we conducted 71 semi-structured in-depth telephone interviews with low-income abortion clients in Arizona, Florida, New York, and Oregon. Women reported weighing numerous factors when determining which circumstances warranted public funding. Though most women generally supported coverage, they deviated from their initial support when asked about particular circumstances. Respondents felt most strongly that abortion should not be covered when a woman could not afford another child or was pregnant outside of a romantic relationship. Participants used disparaging language to describe the presumed behavior of women faced with unintended pregnancies. In seeking to discredit "other" women's abortions, women revealed the complex nature of abortion stigma. We propose that women's abortion experiences and subsequent opinions on coverage indicated three distinct manifestations of abortion stigma: women (1) resisted the prominent discourse that marks women who have had abortions as selfish and irresponsible; (2) internalized societal norms that stereotype women based on the circumstances surrounding the abortion; and (3) reproduced stigma by distancing themselves from the negative stereotypes associated with women who have had abortions.


Asunto(s)
Aborto Inducido/psicología , Medicaid/economía , Mujeres Embarazadas/psicología , Servicios de Salud para Mujeres/economía , Aborto Inducido/economía , Adolescente , Adulto , Femenino , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud , Humanos , Entrevistas como Asunto , Pobreza , Embarazo , Estigma Social , Factores Socioeconómicos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Estados Unidos , Adulto Joven
20.
Seizure ; 23(8): 629-35, 2014 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24878105

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: We explored the contraceptive experiences of female teens with epilepsy, including their knowledge and perceptions of interactions between antiepileptic drugs and hormonal contraception and contraceptive decision-making processes. METHOD: From November 2012 to May 2013, we conducted one online survey (n=114) and 12 online focus group discussions (n=26) with female teens with epilepsy about their contraceptive experiences and unmet needs. Survey data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and focus group transcripts were analyzed thematically using modified grounded theory methods. RESULTS: Both survey and focus group participants reported believing that interactions between epilepsy medications and hormonal contraceptives could lead to reductions in contraceptive efficacy and seizure control. However, their knowledge about these types of medication interactions was often incomplete. Many study participants viewed contraceptive decision making as a difficult process, and some participants reported avoiding hormonal contraceptives because of potential interactions with antiepileptic drugs. Study participants reported relying on health care providers and parents for contraceptive decision-making support. Focus group participants also reported they wanted health care providers to provide more in-depth and comprehensive counseling about contraception, and that they desired peer support with contraceptive decisions. CONCLUSION: The ability to make informed contraceptive decisions is important for teens with epilepsy as interactions between anti-epileptic drugs and hormonal contraceptives can impact seizure occurrence and lead to an increased risk of unplanned pregnancy. Guidance for providers offering contraceptive care to this population is needed, as well as a contraceptive support tool that empowers teens with epilepsy to advocate for desired health care.


Asunto(s)
Anticonvulsivantes/uso terapéutico , Anticonceptivos/uso terapéutico , Epilepsia/tratamiento farmacológico , Epilepsia/psicología , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Adolescente , Anticonvulsivantes/farmacología , Anticonceptivos/farmacología , Toma de Decisiones , Interacciones Farmacológicas , Femenino , Humanos , Padres , Relaciones Profesional-Paciente , Adulto Joven
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...